Latest post on Left Futures

£12bn more cuts will crucify poorest in society and are not necessary

Austerity Stops hereSo the Tories are able to tell us that Labour plans to cut the deficit (which they have never seen) will increase costs by precisely £3,028 per household, a figure now definitively rubbished by the Institute of Fiscal Studies and which the Tory party chairman has now admitted is mere “guesswork”. Yet they can’t tell us how their much-trumpeted £12bn welfare cuts will be funded or who the (big time) losers will be. Surprising, that. Either they’ve never worked out how to achieve a further colossal £12bn cutback in welfare benefits or, much more likely, they know that to reveal what it’s going to cost the victims would be exceptionally damaging just 5 weeks away from the election.

But the key point is that they’ve not backed away from the figure, and they clearly have every intention of carrying it through. So much for Cameron pretending the worst of the cuts was over. So much for Osborne saying living standards are now rising and will continue to rise each year. The truth is, living standards will be flat for the rest of this decade and the Tories are deliberately targeting the very poorest and most helpless in our society to pay for the bankers’ criminal recklessness.

The Tories have already indicated that they will extend the freeze on working-age welfare benefits for another 2 years. This will hit those in work more than those out of work because of the 13 million persons in the UK officially identified as being in poverty (i.e. with a household income less than 60% of the median wage), 6.5 million are employed compared with 6.3 million who are not. The Tories have also said they will reduce the cap on household claims from £26,000 a year to £23,000. That’s bad enough, but it only accounts for about a quarter of the £12bn Tory cuts. So where will the rest come from?

Leaks to the BBC show what else they have in mind. These include restricting child benefit to just the first two children, scrapping industrial injuries benefit by passing the costs to firms (and if companies don’t have an insurance policy, workers will be put into a default scheme and made to pay a levy to fund it), as well as imposing a regional benefits cap, taxing disability benefits, and reducing eligibility for the carer’s allowance. Some of these would remove essential bottom-line protections for people in great need. Even then it would still only achieve a cut collectively of around £5bn.

Why are cuts like this necessary at all? There are 180,000 potential taxpayers with very high incomes who claim non-domiciled status in order to pay no tax. Abolish this anachronistic hand-out to the very rich, and tax receipts could be boosted by £10-15bn a year. Revalue property from 1991 values, introduce more Council Tax bands at the top end, and there is an additional £10-12bn in the coffers. Why gratuitously hurt the poor?


  1. Robert says:

    It’s not good attacking the Tories, when none of us know what labour will be doing.

    We all had a glimpse of labour with Reeves statement between Miliband and Reeves I would say it’s a toss of a coin which one has the best solutions .

    My guess both think the idea of a work house is looking good, remember Brown thought putting unmarried mothers into the workhouse was a good idea.

    The Lab-Lib Tory pact or which ever ways it turns out, at least Scotland as an alternative.

  2. John.P reid says:

    I think more should be made of john McDonnell’s view that If labour lose the election, he’ll try to swing it towards the left and if there is another leader who tries to take us back to the centre ground, then his lot will cause trouble ,the tony Benn we’ve lost as it wasn’t left wing enough brigade, calling Kinnock Ramsey Mckinnock, because Kinnock couldn’t support Scargills unlawful suicidal vanity project

  3. gerry says:

    Michael – that is a rhetorical question isn’t it: “why gratuitously hurt the poor”? We both know why.

    Sadly, surveys show that most voters do back the Tory/Lib Dem targeting of benefit claimants – and part of that is down to those programmes on Channel 4 and 5 about benefits cheats, deadbeat fathers, 26 kids and counting etc etc…these examples have lodged in the public consciousness for some years now, which is how the Tories and Lib Dems can get away with it.

    No party can be seen to be on the side of those who don’t want to work – and yes we must face reality and acknowledge that there are some people who don’t want to work or have given up wanting to earn their own living, though not as many as the Daily Mail or Jeremy Kyle would have us believe.

    All we can do is to keep pointing out the facts about how small a % benefit fraud actually is, how many people don’t actually claim benefits to which they are entitled, and how it is tax evasion and avoidance which is the real villain. And of course the fact that all of us bailed out the banks and the City, transferring money from the working/middle class to the rich like Robin Hood in reverse.

© 2024 Left Futures | Powered by WordPress | theme originated from PrimePress by Ravi Varma