Why the IMF & World Bank should accompany neoliberalism into the dustbin of history

IMF World Bank meetings logoWe are constantly being told that 2014 is the centenary of the start of the First World War, but rather less – or indeed nothing at all – is being made of the fact that this year is also the 70th anniversary of the establishment of the IMF and World Bank. That is more than a pity because both these institutions are redolent of the Washington Consensus, the darker side of US foreign policy. And of the domination of the Western countries over the former colonies and the emergent economies, all of which are now under profound challenge and being forced to give way to new structures of power.

As neo-liberalism has become increasingly volatile and toxic under the impact of financialised capitalism over the last three decades, it has become more and more clear that a new model of global governance is needed that fits these new constellations of power. It would also be helpful if Labour, which has so far concentrated exclusively on domestic issues, could extend its reach by highlighting how its domestic vision of the realignment of corporate power should apply also within the world community. Continue reading

Parliament tomorrow debates the impact of Tory welfare reforms on poverty

foodbank-map-orangeTwo events in this last week point up both the savagery and mindlessness of the Tories’ continuing and relentless assault on benefits. One was Osborne’s declaration that, after lopping off £25bn from the social security system in this parliament, he will make additional £25bn cuts in the next parliament half of which will be severed from working-age benefits (with scarcely a cheep of protest from Labour). The other was the revelation that up to 40,000 people have been wrongly identified as liable for the bedroom tax, and therefore either facing eviction or forced to move to one-bedroom properties, as a result of DWP error.

These are just the latest items in the catalogue of the sheer nastiness of Tory Britain which seems aimed ultimately at the disposal of the entire welfare system with the exception of benefits for pensioners (whose votes are needed), even though nearly all of it has been earned by 40 years of payments of national insurance contributions to which those who have subsequently fallen on hard times are therefore fully entitled. Continue reading

Top 1% now on £1,917 per week, average incomes of 90% down 9%

Is there no end to rising inequality? Probably not, until the 90% take a stand and push back hard, refusing to take it any more. Reaching that point of real resistance would be helped by the Labour party telling the truth that austerity is not about paying off the deficit – we’ve already suffered enormous pain and hardship and injustice, but the deficit has hardly been cut at all – it’s really about shrinking the State and extending the market into everything, so you’ll only get what the market pays you – £85,000 a week at the top, £285 a week for the 5 million workers paid below the living wage, and next to nothing if you’re one of the 2.5 million unemployed, and actually nothing at all if you’re one of the 860,000 persons currently ‘sanctioned’. Continue reading

Mothers facing brunt of Tory attacks

The economy may for now have escaped a ‘triple-dip’ but women, particularly those of us who are mothers, have experienced a triple- whammy from cuts which hit us as workers, as claimants and as carers.

As the Fawcett Society recently identified:

  • Women are being hit hardest by job cuts in the public sector;
  • Women are most affected as the services and benefits they use most are cut; and
  • Women are being left ‘filling the gaps’ as state services are withdrawn. Continue reading

The Sunday Times Rich List – the antidote

The best antidote I have seen to the annual Sunday Times Rich List! A beautiful film illustration of the realities of wealth inequality. And in order to eliminate inequality, we don’t have to change the distribution to what most people regard as the ideal. We only have to change it to what people think it is anyway. And only 6% of the people would be any worse off!

OK. It is about the US, but Britain is not very different. Almost 6m viewings so far.

(hat-tip: Socialist Unity)