Labour should prioritise unions over business

There are 400 ‘business representatives’ at the Labour Party conference this week, to highlight an interesting choice of words found in a recent Financial Times report. I am kind of hoping that the phrase is an unnecessarily imprecise synonym for ‘exhibitors’.

But if the rules have been changed while I wasn’t looking and the Confederation of British Industry and the Institute of Directors do get official delegations nowadays, that would only mark the logical culmination of the trajectory Labour has been on since the days of the Prawn Cocktail Offensive of some 20 years ago. Continue reading

Lobbyists can still sleep soundly

The Cameron technique becomes clearer by the day:

Pick up a problem that is causing public anger, make an instant speech declaring himself fully on-side, and then hit it with a wet flannel.

  • Bankers crash the economy and spark a slump – set up a Commission years later, then endorse its conclusions that are too feeble to have much effect.
  • Predatory capitalism – remove a knighthood from Fred Goodwin.
  • Executive pay excesses – give shareholders a vote, which they’ve got already and don’t use. Continue reading

Where Fox goes, is Gove far behind?

The Government has set great store on claiming that the Fox saga was a one-off. He had broken the Ministerial code, he had refused to heed warnings from his Permanent Secretary that his behaviour was outside the constitutional guidelines for such a sensitive position, and in effect he was running a privatised foreign and defence policy independent of the FCO and MOD. But, Cameron and others insisted, there were no wider implications because no other Ministers were behaving in this way.

Step forward Jonathan Djanogly, the justice minister, who right on cue has been forced out of regulating the claims management industry after an investigation by the Cabinet Secretary on the grounds that he didn’t declare that his brother-in-law owns a firm that provided staff for the claims management companies, and that he and his family could profit from the changes to legal aid he was piloting through Parliament. But that’s minor compared to Gove. Continue reading