The big downside of this election

ballot boxApart from the narrowness in the polling between the two main parties, the other dramatic characteristic of this election is the number of people who are profoundly disgruntled and deep-down angry at the Establishment, in which they include Labour as well as the Tories, and are likely either not to vote at all or to vote UKIP.

The reasons variously tossed around are that “they’re all the same/nothing ever gets done/there’s no point because nothing changes/I’m not voting because politics doesn’t interest me”, etc., etc. UKIP will pick up quite a number of these turned-off disenchanted – may even come second in a large number of constituencies – even though it’s led by a phoney imposter who was an investment banker and preens himself as a working class lad in a pub with a pint of beer in his hand. But despite Farage’s obvious pretentiousness and the fact that UKIP will probably end up with only a handful of seats, what that tells you is that the big parties have massively failed in the eyes of a significant and growing section of the population. So what should be our response? Continue reading

Reform of Parliament should be prime target for next government

What they never told you about Parliament

People understandably are angry at what they see as a raucous and rowdy mob at PMQs and at the MPs’ expenses scandal recently rehearsed by the Rifkind-Straw scandal of access for cash, but these are the more visible aspects of Parliament’s activities. Sadly it is the much less visible dimension of how Parliament routinely works which is the real problem. The purpose of Parliament is to hold the government to account, though most MPs spend much of their time scheming to secure their party advantage and to promote what they hope will be their ministerial career. But in terms of holding the government to account, the real raison d’etre, Parliament is currently not fit for purpose. Continue reading

Making Parliament more effective is not just a matter of longer sittings

Margaret Hodge, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, had a point when she said Parliament should sit for longer sessions if it is to perform its scrutiny function properly. After all the current Parliamentary session is about to end having sat for less than 140 days in the last year.

But whilst Parliament certainly does need to have longer sessions, that is not a sufficient answer for the issue of accountability. Parliament could sit for double the length of present sessions, but if that time is not used effectively and decisively, it won’t make much difference. Continue reading

Whips’ control over scrutiny of parliamentary bills badly needs reform

One of the key problems in Parliament which is little understood, but which hugely undermines its effectiveness, is the Whips’ stranglehold over the scrutiny of Government bills. At present Members of these Bill committees are chosen by the House Committee of Selection, itself composed of Whips from the main parties with a chair chosen by the Executive. It has long been clear that this mechanism has serious disadvantages. Continue reading

MPs support big reforms in way Parliament is run

Parliamentary procedure seems arcane and boring to most people, but actually it matters a lot because it largely determines what gets into legislation and what does not, and why so many of the changes the public wants to see happen get blocked.   For that reason it’s heartening to see signs that the old ways, which have always allowed the government of the day to manipulate the House and keep reform at bay, are beginning to change.   Parliament First, a cross-party group to drive parliamentary reform which I chair, has just surveyed all MPs on their support (or otherwise) for a series of major reforms.   The results were overwhelmingly favourable. Continue reading