Latest post on Left Futures

Farage wants workers’ votes but offers no workers’ rights

THEYRE NOT ON OUR SIDECompared with its 2010 General Election Manifesto, UKIP’s manifestos for the recent Euro and local elections were remarkably light on detail but long on saloon bar, right wing sentiment – open borders/immigration, leave the EU, allow smoking in pubs and the sort of petty nationalism that allows us to see some similarities – but not exact comparisons – between UKIP and the Poujadism that flourished very brightly, but very briefly, in France in the 1950s.

Pierre Poujade was the leader of a right wing populist movement of the lower middle class and self-employed who rallied against big business and public administration and, of course, the unions. Poujadists shot to prominence in France in the 1956 election with 53 deputies (MPs) but lacking a clear policy other than what it was against Poujadism collapsed within two years.

Remarkably, for a party that is big on its support for SMEs (small and medium enterprises) neither of UKIPs 2014 manifestos had much to say on employment and more particularly, employment law.

In a 2012 blog by the then (and soon to be expelled) UKIP MEP, Godfrey Bloom, entitled EU employment law – stupidity holding back growth the only concrete references to employment law are the phrases “impossible EU and UK employment legislation” and “horrible employment legislation so nobody wants to take on new workers” – just assertions with no explanation at all.

Even tracking back to 2010 the only employment rights issues discernable from the UKIP Manifesto is a commitment to “repeal … the Temporary Workers’ Directive” and “withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms”.

To find out what UKIP is really up to we have to lift the stone off their Small Business manifesto published on 24th January 2013, work that has been initiated by Narmada Thiranagama in her 2013 blog for the Institute of Employment Rights UKIP in the workplace.

The manifesto is still available here although UKIP has removed all trace of it from its own website. Hardly surprising; it may become something of a liability for a party trying to attract workers’ votes to be seen to be opposed to workers’ rights (a trick that Thatcher pulled off with remarkable regularity however).

We get a flavour of how repeal of workers’ rights is top of UKIP’s agenda when in the opening paragraph of the section The Burden of European Regulation on SMEs the party says “an example of the costly new application of a regulation is … asbestos regulations”. Try telling the surviving relatives of a mesothelioma victim that there is excessive regulation of asbestos!

UKIP lists its five “most damaging or costly regulations” two of which are concerned with employment rights – the Working Time Regulations and the Temporary and Agency Workers Directive.

In a remarkable example of the world turned upside down UKIP suggests that permanent workers enjoy job security and paid holidays at the cost of lower wages than they would otherwise receive but those on short term contracts who forgo the benefits of a permanent contact enjoy higher pay!

This happy arrangement is, according to UKIP, under threat from Temporary Agency Workers’ Directive. UKIP would “put an end to most legislation regarding matters such as weekly working hours, holidays and holiday, overtime, redundancy or sick pay, etc.” Particularly in UKIP’s sights are rights to maternity and paternity leave. In UKIPland “it would be up to each employer to decide whether to offer parental leave.”

In a world where money trumps rights every time, UKIP suggests that SMEs that do not offer parental leave will have to offer young women (not men) higher wages or recruit from a smaller pool of willing labour.

UKIP are unhappy with the equal opportunities cases being heard by Employment Tribunals, applicants to which are already reeling from the attacks made by the Cable – Beecroft alliance. Echoing Cable and Beecroft, UKIP supports the two year qualifying period before a worker is entitled to bring a case to the Tribunal.

It’s not just equal opportunities cases that annoy UKIP, workers being awarded “unlimited compensation” in cases of ‘dismissal on heath and safety grounds’ … is unjust and excessive.”

To sum up, “UKIP would … scrap most ‘equality and discrimination’ legislation, cap all compensation payments and allow common sense to prevail.” Clearly a People’s Charter for a People’s Army!

So far City wide boy Nigel Farage has ruled out an alliance with Marine le Pen and the Front National, fascist winners of the Euro-poll in France, (interestingly, Jean Marie le Pen, Marine’s father and founder of the FN is a graduate of the Poujadist movement) but he has been spotted in talks with Beppe Grillo, leader of Italy’s populist 5 Star Movement and second in the Euro-election there. Grillo has posted a flattering piece about Farage on his website.

The emergence of a right wing populist bloc in the European Parliament although not powerful enough to rewrite existing Euro-legislation that unions have found useful – for example, European Works Councils and Information & Consultation – it probably has enough strength to ensure that the brakes are applied to the creation of the European supra-state and the development of social Europe.

Adrian Weir is assistant secretary of the Campaign for Trade Union Freedom on whose website this article first appeared

One Comment

  1. Robert says:

    It was labour that attacked the Trade Unions not Farage, it’s labour that attacks the unemployed the poor the working class not Farage, I have spent 40 years in the GMB I was one of those who demanded a vote on disaffiliation and it came close to getting it.

    We have a right to a vote on the EU we have never had one in 1975 it was for a common market not a take over.

© 2024 Left Futures | Powered by WordPress | theme originated from PrimePress by Ravi Varma