Latest post on Left Futures

Left Unity one year on

Left unityThis weekend saw Left Unity hold its first national conference. Well, not really. It was preceded by its foundation back in November last year, and a further national gathering in Manchester last March, but who’s counting right? So 12 months down the line, where do things stand with Britain’s newest leftist unity initiatives? Should Labour be worried another potential rival stands poised to bleed its voter base, or does that prospect remain remote?

You can tell something about a party by the character of its conference. Braving adverts for cruises, Netflix and the Murdoch press, the intermittent live feed showed a meeting much smaller than its predecessors. Though, to be fair, as a conference it was clearly they were operating a branch delegation system – a practice itself quite alien to standard far left procedure of mobilising ordinary members to attend and labelling them delegates in reports. Another major departure was public and, at times, heated debates. However, while it is scrupulously democratic to allow for debates that soft soap the so-called Islamic State terror outfit in the name of “anti-imperialism” and to hear another calling on Left Unity to not condemn ISIS and its co-mediaevalists as such, smart politics it definitely is not. That three or four votes were cast in favour matters not, valuable conference time was hijacked by a tiny, Spartoid fringe. Meanwhile, weightier issues were allowed to fall off the agenda.

On other occasions arguments brewed up about the order of the agenda, standing orders, procedure, chair’s actions and the like. One of the most astonishing challenges to the running order came from a delegate who noted that the debate on LU’s election strategy was near the back of the agenda and might not be covered if other reports and debates dragged on. He therefore requested it be moved up as a priority debate first thing Sunday morning. Amazingly, John Pearson for the Standing Orders Committee opposed the move on the grounds that “electoral strategy isn’t a priority”. Even more baffling was that conference backed his position by a large margin. Hello? What’s happening six months from now? The debate however did take place but it goes to show that the far left’s desire to create an electoral alternative to Labour isn’t matched by their willingness to take such a project seriously.

Other points of note, unsurprisingly LU adopted the boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel movement, voted against austerity and for scrapping the disgusting work capability assessment and, on elections, has chosen to buddy up with TUSC and rule out a blank arrangement with the Greens. Though, I’m sure LU branches will make local pacts with Greens where they deem it appropriate.

All this considered, is it fair to say LU has made discernible progress? As I’m a Labour lackey, you might expect me to say no. And you’d be right. Since the March conference I’ve occasionally glanced at the development of the organisation (hat tip the Weekly Worker for following these things so you don’t have to) and it’s been a really weird experience. People suspended for “misreporting” meetings in the WW, for using intemperate language and saying unkind things on the internet, and – creepiest of all – one idiot for circulating a photo of national secretary Kate Hudson in her swimming costume. What is up with some people? And that’s not to mention allegations about payments withheld to workers employed at a social enterprise run by an ex-principal speaker.

Sure, all organisations – especially new organisations – have teething troubles, but the biggest problem LU have is the approach it has taken to building itself. Quite understandably, a lot of the comrades involved have had fingers burned by the petty tyrannies that litter the left. A few might have suffered a proscription at the hands of the Labour Party too. Therefore the desire to build something that has nothing in common with toy town democratic centralism or bureaucratism is a noble one. The efforts to accommodate awkwards, the long-winded debates and equally long documents put before members, the tetchyness about personal conduct and whether the organisation requires safe spaces are attempts to refound a radical left on a wholly new basis.

From the outside, however, LU appears little more than a Facebook group with conferences. I have no doubt many of its comrades are up to their necks in activity, but not, it appears, LU work. Branch meetings, yes. An occasional outing for the local group’s banner, yes. But consistent work campaigning as Left Unity in a campaign or solidarity action? It would appear not. Take a look at the last year’s worth of local council by-elections – no LU. It’s as if they are trying to incubate the perfect organisation via resolutionary socialism and rounds of national gatherings before placing LU before the consideration of the wider public.

Nevertheless, LU do have luck on their side. The small political space for a left alternative to Labour is still going begging in England and Wales. The Greens might be putting membership and voter weight on if the polls and local by-election results are anything to go by, but there is a constituency of leftish ex-Labour anti-politics people they will never appeal to. LU – despite the indulgent ‘in-group’ name – can go places other radicalisms cannot reach. But to do so it needs to hang up its hang-ups and start organising as a party serious about being a party. Its window of opportunity for securing 2-3% of the national vote won’t stay open forever.


  1. Ric Euteneuer says:

    So…one year on, and zero public profile – well done, LU. *slow handclap*

    And what distinguishes LU from RESPECT, the Socialist Alliance, Socialist Alliance (Democracy Platform), the Democratic Socialist Alliance, the Socialist Green Unity Coalition, the Alliance for Green Socialism, the Socialist Labour Party, and the Tufty Club. Not much, it seems. And that’s before we even get to Scotland.

    The theory of disparate left groups burying their respective hatchets and working towards a common socialist good is ostensibly an attractive one, but that’s never, ever the practice. The variety of groupscules and tendencies that theoretically coalesce into the People’s Popular Democratic Popular Front of Judaea (General Command) don’t actually do that – they remain as a faction within the ‘party/movement/tendency’ and attempt to use it to recruit people to their group, or to (by foul means or fair) change the orientation of the group to match the orientation of their faction. ‘Twas ever thus. I know our electoral system bears a heavy burden on this, but really, other than providing the trainspotter tendency with a modicum of self-satisfaction in ideological purity, what does Left Unity’s ‘position’ on Palestine/workfare/work capability assessment actually achieve? Zilch. Fine words on an order paper and a policy document people will never, ever read.

    It’s CLASSIC substitutionism. Rather than getting involved in campaigns and local politics and local communities (and by “campaigns” I don’t mean fronts for your ridiculous tendencies), hours spent in airless rooms debating the theory of surplus value and its application might suit the failed academic, but in terms of delivering a better life for the working class, it fails miserably.

    If people actually want to make a difference, they need to get in and amongst the communities they purport to represent – this is how the PTB-GO in Belgium, the KPOe in Austria and Die Linke in Germany – all left of social democracy parties in their respective countries. We don’t have the luxury of spending years on sorting out a definitive “One State/Two State theories on Palestine” line whilst the economy goes down the pan. As Phil says the “window of opportunity for securing 2-3% of the national vote won’t stay open forever”

  2. swatantra says:

    I went to the pre Conference a year ago, when they were planning setting up Left Unity because i thought we need some kind of common understanding between all the different factions of the Left, bringing it all together. That Conference at Central Westminster Hall was pretty inspirational and poignant because the EDL had arranged a demo outside. Its the Left against the facists and the dark Forces of the Right.
    But a year on, and Ken Loaches intervention, nothing, as I feared. As we all know the Left is incapable of coming together to defeat the Right, thats why I never joined up. Its a futile task, and the only way to effect change is through the Labour Party and the Cooperative Party.

    1. Ric Euteneuer says:

      Yes – with our present electoral system, there’s little or no value, other than self-satisfaction, in such ventures, as has been proved again…and again…and again. If someone from LU would like to disabuse me of this notion and tell me why this venture is different from the Socialist Alliance, Socialist Alliance (Democracy Platform), the Democratic Socialist Alliance etc etc, I’d be glad to hear how and why.

  3. James Martin says:

    The real problem with LU is that it is not built in and around the actual movement, but outside it. There are millions of trade unionists, and tens of thousands of active reps and shop stewards, but how many have heard of LU? A few dozen? Perhaps a few hundred?

    In the past both the Communist Party and Militant at different times and for different reasons could become important left poles of attraction because they were part of the working class activist base and had some union influence, but LU make even the SWP appear relevant.

    No, this is not a genuine organisation but merely a sect of sects that if anything is less than the sum of its creaking parts. Respect for a short time was slightly more newsworthy (as a result of the very large anti-war wave and Galloway’s personality cult), but without either LU is nothing.

    1. Ric Euteneuer says:

      Yes, this is the thing – all the different groups have little or no basis not just in community groups or campaigns, but in trade unions. Gone are the days when CP members and/or Millies held a majority of seats on the Executive of various unions.

© 2023 Left Futures | Powered by WordPress | theme originated from PrimePress by Ravi Varma