Latest post on Left Futures

Why is Labour silent on this viciously anti-migrant bill?

_70390390_70390389On the day the Home Secretary announced she was abandoning the Government’s racist “Go home” vans – trialed in Brent this summer to a huge public outcry – the Labour frontbench decided to sit on their hands in the vote on the second reading of the new Immigration Bill.

Just six Labour MPs voted against the bill. They were Diane Abbott (Hackney North and Stoke Newington), Kelvin Hopkins (Luton North), David Lammy (Tottenham), John McDonnell (Hayes and Harlington), Fiona Mactaggart (Slough) and Dennis Skinner (Bolsover). Islington North MP Jeremy Corbyn acted as teller for the noes.

Much of the Bill is probably unworkable and based on flawed data. Channel 4 News debunked the Government’s figure that foreign visitors cost the NHS £2 bn a year, pointing out the real cost was a fraction of this.

The Bill is poorly drafted and a response to tabloid and UKIP pressure. Its real purpose is to ensure that immigration stays on the agenda throughout the pre-election period. As November’s LRC Labour Briefing comments:

Labour will be embarrassed unless it changes its stance. Yvette Cooper described some of the measures as “sensible”.  But how “sensible” is it to stop “illegal migrants”, as she calls them, from opening bank accounts or getting driving licences, forcing everyone to produce complex paperwork to prove their right to exist? And how “sensible” is it to force every landlord in the country, including people taking in lodgers, families sub-letting to relative, and most hostels, to check new tenants’ documents?

These proposals have been rejected, mocked and slated by housing professionals, landlord bodies, lawyers, children’s charities, local councils and tenant organisations. Instead of standing with them against the Tories, Yvette Cooper has run scared, ceding the argument and choosing to fight the election on a terrain she cannot win.’

Speaking in the parliamentary debate, Jeremy Corbyn MP described the Bill as “dog-whistle politics, the mantras being that every immigrant is an illegal immigrant who must somehow be condemned and that immigration is the cause of all the problems in our society.” He concluded: “If we descend into a UKIP-generated xenophobic campaign, it weakens and demeans all of us and our society, and we are all the losers for that.

John McDonnell MP called the Bill “the most racist piece of legislation that this country has witnessed since the 1960s… aimed at setting up a regime of harassment for migrants.”

He commented:

The Tories believe that they can stack up votes at the next election by promoting this form of covert racism under the guise of immigration control. By campaigning to expose and oppose this racist Bill we can show them that people are not willing to be dragged into the gutter.”

The Labour front bench should listen to these principled voices.


  1. themadmullahofbricklane says:

    Once again we see the phrase ” dog whistle politics”. It seems be beloved of the far left but can anyone explain i?

    Could the writer also explain their support for “illegal” immigrants illegally getting bank accounts and passports and how they would do this? I can only assume with false documents. Does the writer condone this further criminality?

  2. Rod says:

    The Tories want to stem the tide of votes moving in a UKIP direction and Labour’s Daily Mail reading, swing-voter focus groups will have indicated their displeasure at ‘out of control’ immigration etc. It’s as simple as that.

    And let’s face it, as clever as Miliband is he doesn’t have what takes to articulate a convincing alternative to the tabloid narrative.

    In reality, as with much of the PLP’S performance in opposition (Andy Burnham excluded), the PLP have done well to resist the dangers implicit in venturing beyond their considerable inadequacy.

  3. Robert says:

    If you do have an open door make sure you build the houses to make the people happy who are on the waiting list.

    Sadly Labour were not really a political party they were a Tony Blair party and he was filling his address book, his eyes only saw the dollar sign. Then you had Campbell who is really narked off nobody offered him Tony Blair’s old seat, and now you have McBride writing books and boy it’s interesting if only for the wrong reasons. Sadly Blair Brown Campbell ball and Miliband do not come out of this book very well really.

    Should we be saying illegal are here they are not going home make them legal after doing a back ground check get them working earning paying taxes, me I would would but that me.

    Should we only allow people into this country who are poor not the rich, again yes unless they have a specific job that we need like doctors, I do not think we need expert IED builders.

    But hell I’m old labour very old Labour.

  4. John Reid says:

    IS David lammy not on the front bunch anymore

  5. Because Labour is dead.

  6. Robert says:

    You know he’s not John he turned down a post on the front bench.

  7. John Reid says:

    I didn’t know,good for him,

© 2024 Left Futures | Powered by WordPress | theme originated from PrimePress by Ravi Varma