Latest post on Left Futures

Why we need a Red Labour alternative

red labourA couple of weeks ago, I wrote a piece for my own blog entitled Sleepwalking in the Labour Party about the failure of the left in the party to get ourselves organised in the context of the long hegemony of the right in the party and in the face of a Blairite retrenchment in One Nation Labour. The article was meant as a provocation – to ask individual party members:

If you’re not in the party to cause trouble, considering its trajectory for the last 15 years, what are you in it for?”

The reaction was interesting. The vast majority of comments were supportive. That was the easy bit. We can hardly fail to agree on what is wrong. However, a few people asked the more pertinent questions, which were “How?”, “What now?” and “What can I do?” That article didn’t seek to answer those questions, or map out a plan of action. I want to start the task of doing that now.

Firstly, although the article was an appeal to individual responsibility for the situation we’re in, the answers can only ever be collective. Like anything else in the Labour movement, it has to be rooted in collective experience and collective solutions. I believe that some of the answers lie exactly in some of those problems we’ve experienced both as a party and a left in the party. Specifically: education; democracy and organisation.

The first one is the lack of education in the party. When I say education, I don’t mean in a formal sense, but informally, through discussion in party meetings. This has all but gone – and it is a massive vacuum.

Secondly, the Blairite “revolution” in the party had at its heart the closing down of democracy in the party. Blair and his friends needed this to secure their “New Labour” project. This is a clear block on any movement which seeks to change the party.

Thirdly – while the right wing of the party, and the Progress wing specifically, have been extremely well organised, not surprisingly, considering the financial resources at their disposal courtesy of Lord Sainsbury, the left in the party have been fragmented, disorganised and ineffective at getting their message across and winning positions in the party.

This is not the sum of everything that is wrong in the party – far from it, unfortunately – but those three areas (education, democracy and organising) might come together in a project that attempts to grab some power back for members. A few of us on the left of the party, involved in the Red Labour Facebook group, have been talking about this for some time. That involvement has led us to the question: should there be a Red Labour in the real world?

It isn’t (and never has been) a case of trying to replace anything else on the left of the party, but to gather forces and organise them with an explicit focus on the Labour Party – to give a coherence and confidence to attempts to present an alternative to “New Labour lite”. At present, there are other positive things going on in the party – the Defend the Link campaign, the Labour Assembly Against Austerity, Unite’s engagement in party selections, the continuing efforts of the Campaign for Labour Party Democracy to name a few, which will hopefully slot together with Red Labour in a virtuous cycle as opposed to the vicious cycle we’ve been trapped in for the past decade or more.

The Red Labour Facebook page began its life just over two years ago, in June 2011. In a couple of years of existence, it has grown to become the largest Facebook group on the left of the Labour Party. At the time of writing, the Red Labour page is ‘liked’ by (as in followed by) 4,693 people. Compared to other broadly Labour-left orientated groups, it is now the largest by quite some distance:

  • Red Labour 4,693 likes
  • Fabian Society 3,147 likes
  • Compass 1,648 members
  • Labour Left 1,225 likes
  • Left Futures 1,180 likes
  • LRC 667 likes
  • CLPD 198 likes

Granted, we’ve still got some way to go before hitting the Labour Party’s 147,675 likes, but we’ve gained nearly 2,000 followers in the last 2-3 months, so who knows what’s possible? What is significant too, is the amount of ‘buzz’ that there is around Red Labour. At the time of writing, 14,389 people were “talking” about Red Labour on Facebook (i.e. interacting in some way with the group). This compares to the 6,124 talking about the Labour Party on Facebook.

Red Labour creates online discussion about Labour movement politics. We have aimed to do so in lively and at times controversial ways. It has proved an enormously successful formula over the last two years. In the last six months, particularly, it’s been apparent that we are sitting on a phenomenon. We now regularly get 100 likes and 200 shares of our statuses, some reaching over 100,000 people on Facebook. A recent post quoting Keir Hardie on the arrival of the royal baby in 1894 reached 181,568 people and attracted 14,970 likes, comments or shares. Our interaction with those people who have liked the page grows on a daily basis.

About six months ago, in this context, we started assessing the impact of the page politically. We looked at the state of the Labour left and felt that it should be making the sort of progress that we were online. While all the time bearing in mind the difference between social media political activity and that in the movement itself, we nevertheless started to wonder about the huge void that there was for socialist education, discussion and debate in the party and how Red Labour might be able to plug that gap and help build the left in the party more practically.

Over the last few months have been developing this idea while steadily building its Facebook (and now Twitter) presence. It seems to us that there is a desperate need for a project that takes the Red Labour approach to Labour members and supporters in different parts of the country, offering an alternative not only to austerity, but one that boldly and confidently challenges the narrowing of the political agenda in the Labour Party – offering radical alternatives and allowing members to develop and voice those alternatives in independent “Red Labour” fora. This would not be about building a membership organisation, it would be about creating forums for socialist alternatives in the party and organising the Labour left specifically.

Red Labour is a project in the making. It is not the finished article and will require building over months and years. Although it is a long term project, with education at its heart, there is now an urgency caused by the ‘One Nation Labour’s backsliding towards Blairism. The last six months have seen a clear change in the leadership under Ed Miliband as the 2015 election comes into view – and it is bad, rather than good news for the left as New Labour retrenchment gathers pace. What has also been noticeable, however, is the beginnings of a resistance in the party.

We should all be wary of overplaying this, but it seems there is the start of a groundswell of anti-austerity sentiment amongst sections of the party – and not just amongst its union affiliates. This has been fuelled in particular by the abstention on workfare sanctions, the fudging of the opposition to the Bedroom Tax and most recently, the seven day ‘Wonga’ extension for benefits claimants.

A week or so ago, we decided to put that idea to our Facebook followers, hardly expecting the incredible response we got. The question was:

If Red Labour were to move into the real world, to start to organise within the Party and to hold public meetings based around issues that ordinary people faced, would you support it? Like if you would, and also comment if this interests you.”

In under 12 hours, we received 449 ‘likes’ and 115 comments, 90% of which were wholly positive. Here are some of the typical responses

  • “Absolutely. I want my Labour party back out of the clutches of the current lot in charge”
  • “Yes this would bring me back to Labour”
  • “Yes, definitely! Apart from anything I’d feel a lot happier going along to, and speaking up at, meetings of my local party and university Labour Club knowing there was an organised group and others around who have similar views of what politics should be about. Progress desperately need an organised opposition, especially so in universities etc. where the trade union connection isn’t particularly strong”
  • “I was at Tolpuddle last weekend and heard many similar sentiments; we need to rid ourselves of public school career politicians greedy for personal power. We need discussion groups to establish fundamental principles (remember them?) & then, organised, we need to reclaim OUR party. Hell yes I’m in.”

Even taking into account the obvious caveats about online activism, the response shows that there is a clear desire amongst party members (and those who have recently left) for a clear, socialist alternative in the party, popularly expressed and demanding a voice for our members. It ties in with similar sentiments echoed in the affiliated trade unions over recent months.

Practically speaking, what we have talked about is piloting a few Red Labour meetings around the country, with a broad brief to challenge both Progress and Blue Labour – as well as a developing critique Ed’s One Nation re-branding of New Labour. The real development of the project would be in the regional meetings which would come quickly after any launch. Meetings would initially be planned in areas where we feel we have some base.

Each series of meetings would have policy, campaigning and organising outcomes. We could theme them for maximum impact nationally – e.g. having meetings on “free schools”, “defending the welfare state” or “tax avoidance” in several locations over a period of two week, with local media coverage – as well as all the usual social media. The emphasis would be on giving Labour Party members a voice again, gradually building confidence that we could effect change in the party.

In some ways the Red Labour name is a direct challenge to thePurple and Blue variants and therefore would have a wide appeal. This defines our approach, in a sense. The Red Labour project is based on a belief that there are thousands of Labour members and supporters out there who believe similar things to us or can be convinced by a strong, bold challenge to New Labour lite. This would not be about bringing together the 57 varieties of the left, however – it would be focused on changing the Labour Party solely.

It wouldn’t be set up to compete with any group on the Labour left, but act as an umbrella and work on common campaigns and policy interventions. It would also be about engaging those five million mainly working class voters who have stopped supporting the party since 1997 and those members who have left the party in despair, but are equally despairing of the left outside the party.

It is also about organising the left in the party better – in order to challenge the bureaucratic control of the right. We would hope to attract support from the unions, whilst acknowledging that the success of the Red Labour facebook page has been based on its independent nature – and it will be important to retain this in “the real world”. Most importantly, the point of this would be that it would be grassroots-based.

It would not be encumbered by the committee structure, as it would be more of a forum for our socialist views rather than a membership organisation. Red Labour would have supporters, people who engaged and contributed to the project at various levels, rather than members. Undoubtedly, there are other attempts to do similar things – e.g. on a broader scale with Unite or the Labour Assembly Against Austerity – and we see this as a positive not a negative. It shows that people are starting to stand up and are planning some kind of resistance – at last. We’d welcome joint working, while at the same time believing that Red Labour has both a distinctive approach and longevity.

There is a massive leap from where we are now to a fully functioning, confident and effective left in the party. Obviously, too, there is a long way to go with the Red Labour project, but if the latter can support the former, it has got to be worth our time and effort. Please support us, help us, but most importantly, join us.


  1. Rob the cripple says:

    I really do wish you the best of luck, it is about time the left spoke out, sadly I think your a bit to late.

  2. Syzygy says:

    A big block which you allude to when you write:

    ‘Secondly, the Blairite “revolution” in the party had at its heart the closing down of democracy in the party. Blair and his friends needed this to secure their “New Labour” project. This is a clear block on any movement which seeks to change the party.’

    is that the shadow cabinet is overwhelmingly Blairite .. and the New Labour vetting of PPCs means that at least 50% PLP are right wing.

    I completely agree that political education is essential but, even assuming Ed M’s desire to move leftward, the LP grassroots are hamstrung by the leading politicians.

    George Osborne is currently speaking on WATO pushing out his lies about Labour’s record .. where is the shadow cabinet member furiously protesting against his mendacity? And that’s the problem!

  3. Rod says:

    Syzygy: “where is the shadow cabinet member furiously protesting against his [Osborne’s] mendacity?”

    They seem to have given up on winning in 2015.

    The shadow cabinet have other priorities and now appear to be focused on diminishing and blocking trade union influence within the Labour Party – so after a Labour defeat in 2015 there will be no significant resistance to a Progress leadership candidate nor to a complete take-over of the Party.

  4. Ben Sellers says:

    Syzygy – I understand what you’re getting at. The PLP are dominated by Progressite or other right variants of thinking in the party. That power is also entrenched. However, I disagree that this is the biggest of our problems, at least strategically. I think the biggest problem lies with our failure to organise ourselves as a grassroots force to very successful, but ultimately top-down approach of the right. Of course, it is a matter of judgement whether you think it is a battle that has already been lost, but I genuinely think that the left has ceded ground far too easily to the Blairites – mainly by not concentrating on what could (still) be a potential power base – the ordinary membership of the party – i.e those not tied into the local and/or national bureaucracies.

  5. Paul says:

    Whilst I appreciate the left wanting to organise and provide a more coherent voice, i’d also like to point that Red Labour’s willingness to discuss is not very high. I was not long ago stopped from commenting (or even liking) their posts because I had posted opinions differing to certain members of the group, I did not do so abusively either so I am annoyed to say the very least. Also the generalisation about there being so called ‘Blairites’ everywhere, it’s ridiculous though there are some New Labour leftovers most of those in the leadership which is always the target of the lefts anger are not ‘All Blairites Now’ to misquote a famous someone.

  6. Anya-Nicola Darr says:

    Can you tell me why inspite of liking the page Red Labour I am unable to comment or like any posts. Other people are experiencing the same. I would recommend this Fb page but I can harldy do that when I can’t comment or post. 🙂

  7. Ben Sellers says:

    Hi Anya. Thanks for the heads up. I will check that out and message you via Facebook.

  8. Ben Sellers says:

    Paul. Normally, the only reason the admin would block someone is because of abuse or excessive ‘trolling’ e.g constantly posting up links to other political projects outside the party, or repetitious posting – so it seems strange that has happened. We welcome debate. In fact, it’s essential to the growth of a more democratic party.

    1. Anya-Nicola Darr says:

      Ben I am all for Red Laobur (in my dreams!) I ahve never had the chance to post on there so don’t see how I can be blocked. a couple of others have said same to me. I ahve shown some interest in Left Unity but who wouldn’t given the circumstances! I think we need an open debate on teh Left as to how we get a vocie in today’s political landscape. this may mean looking outside the Laoubr Party if the Left continues to be unheard. therefore, I am keeping my options open. Surely, this isn;t offensive though or trolling?

  9. Ben Sellers says:

    Anya. No, I don’t think that is trolling and we are quite happy to debate with people involved in Left Unity. I think there has been a mistake, so apologies for that. I have now corrected it. If anyone is experiencing the same thing, please ask them to contact me via facebook.

    1. Anya-Nicola Darr says:

      thanks Ben, see you voer there. 😉

© 2024 Left Futures | Powered by WordPress | theme originated from PrimePress by Ravi Varma