Latest post on Left Futures

Explaining Laura Kuenssberg’s Bias

There’s a headline. It’s from the BBC, written by no less a figure than the corporation’s chief political editor. Not something up to the standards expected, you might say. As readers know, I tend not to moan much about the recipient of the licence fee. As a general rule, its news coverage is much better than most and where it fails in impartiality, it can make up in balance – particularly with regard to its flagship current affairs programme, Question Time. But there have been plenty of Labour people outraged by the behaviour of senior BBC journalists of late. Here are some much-shared and criticised examples.

Not exactly fair and not exactly balanced, to borrow the strap line of the Murdoch-owned bilge channel. And into this litany of bias comes Laura Kuenssberg’s blog on Labour’s manifesto. Just look at the state of the headline: “Labour manifesto vision: More spending, more tax, more borrowing”. Let’s be generous here, that is more or less a factually accurate statement. But this is politics. Kuenssberg’s been in the game (at the top of the game) for long enough to know that nothing is neutral in politics, and she knows well enough that it’s quite possible to frame and slant reports in particular ways that favour certain parties over others without explicitly saying “vote Tory”, or whatever.

For the last seven years ‘more spending, more tax, more borrowing’ has been repeated ad nauseum as an attack line by the Tories. The spending line specifically is a charge that the Tories and their friends in the press have used since 1979. Kuenssberg knows this, she isn’t stupid. And it’s outrageous.

What’s going on then? As we have seen before, the BBC is a biased institution: it tilts towards the political establishment. Since Jeremy Corbyn took the leadership of the Labour Party, it, like the rest of official politics and the state, have looked on in a mixture of fascination and horror, almost as if Labour was plotting an insurrection followed by full sovietisation. Not a mild programme of social democracy that would move Britain more in the direction of noted communist power, the Federal Republic of Germany. In the avalanche of destabilisation and attacks on Labour and its leader and the subsequent dumbing down of debate, the BBC has played its part with alacrity.

Also, it finds itself in a particular pickle. Since 2003 and the fall out from the dodgy dossier and the death of weapons expert David Kelly, the BBC has even more diligently bowed the knee to sitting governments. The powers that be want to retain the Royal Charter and therefore carry on as a going concern, and this sentiment is shared across all senior staff, including those in front of the camera. In the context of this general election in which the Tories are widely expected to win, the BBC is playing supplicant and not giving them anywhere near as hard a time as Labour. They hope the Tories will leave the corporation well alone. This is no conspiracy, nor will you find documents instructing senior reporters to go easy, but it’s a structure of feeling working its way through what they do and say.

Is Laura Kuenssberg a Tory then? Who knows for certain but she, like many others, know which side their bread is buttered on.



  1. treborc says:

    New labour put it’s own man in charge of the BBC to ensure they got the reporting they needed, once Tories won they did the same, you work for the boss and do what he says. Hence the BBC should become a pay to view channel then if you want it you pay, if not fine you cannot get it.

  2. Rob says:

    Treborc. I do pay to view the BBC.

  3. Imran Khan says:

    I’m still waiting for an explanation of the title of this piece.

    1. John P Reid says:

      I agree , remember when the BBC said Ian paisley was a cynic(a cynic being someone who hopes something fails rather than a Skeptic) because he didn’t think the IRA/UDA would stop fighting, don’t recall paisley being someone who openly wanted the fighting to continue

      Recall when Derek Bennett had a cigarette lighter shaped like a gun, at a passer bus head,and thretened(all be it he wouldn’t have been able to do it) to shoot the passer by,so cops shot him dead, the jury said he was lawfully killed,and the BBC said the cops had obviously got it wrong to shoot him,even though the jury said it was right to shoot him

      Rem nber when th ababac said cops murdered Roger Sylvester,even though he was lawfully killed
      Recall in 1988 when the BBC conpared thatcher to the Nazis final solution to gas all the Jews

      The BBC has always been left wing,

  4. Andy f says:

    In Stalinist poland thee were few INSTRUCTIONS to journalists but everyone knew what to say or not say to get on or avoid trouble. Same here.

  5. Shirley Knott says:

    Feak and weeble piece, PBC.
    Completely ignores the depth and breadth of current and former tory operatives and close friends of top tories throughout the structure of the bbc, in the upper executivè echelons as well as behind the mics or in front of the cameras. In an organisation with any integrity, K would have been sacked for her outrageous falsification of her interview with JC earlier this year

    As it is, the bbc is behaving as if it is an integral part of the tory party, in the language used, the approach taken towards interview subjects or to supposed analysis. If it’s tory, the choice is soft, supportive, the interviewee treated like a minor royal or beloved celeb (and we know bbc have caved to every demand made by Team May). If it’s Labour, the language is harsh, scornful, denigratory. Interviewees are treated with little respect, almost like recalcitrant criminals, policies are rubbished and political enemies are sought out to cause further harm. No even handedness whatsoever. To the thousands of complainants objecting to the biased coverage, the bbc exonerates itself with its insistence that it is “impartial” – but in terms of how much time it has given participants or issues, not on how things have been handled. This is not “impartiality” as any literate person who looks the word up in a dictionary can easily find out.

  6. John P Reid says:

    John Cole, Martin bell, Andrew marr, Sarah smith, many labour journalists at the BBC

© 2024 Left Futures | Powered by WordPress | theme originated from PrimePress by Ravi Varma