Latest post on Left Futures

Why I’m voting against the benefit cap

commons bench by UK Parliament, file at http://www.flickr.com/photos/uk_parliament/2700549765/sizes/s/in/photostream/This is the text of Diane Abbott’s speech in the House of Commons this afternoon against a ‘welfare cap’. Details of voting will be published as soon as it is available.

Any member of the public watching this debate this afternoon and listening to people jeer, laugh, smirk and joke might imagine that some Members of this House were playing a game. Well, I am rising to say to the House that this is not a game; this is about people’s lives.

Whether they be elderly people who are dependent on some of the age-related benefits that will fall under the cap, the disabled or people in low-paid work who depend on the system of tax credits, this is not a game; this is people’s lives. If it is really the position of Government Members that poor people should be made to live on even less, they should at least have the grace to be dignified about it, and not turn it into a game.

I put it to Government Members and to those on my own Front Bench that social security and people’s lives should not be made a matter of short-term political positioning.

Everyone in the House wants to bring down welfare spending, because welfare spending is the price of Government and social failure. The Chancellor talked as if he were some brave warrior wreaking vengeance on an army of “Benefits Street” layabouts. The reality for British people is very different.

Just this week, we saw 1,500 people queuing for three hours for a low-paid job at Aldi. The picture Government Members like to paint of the British people and what is happening in the benefit system is false, misleading and derogatory, yet it is feeding through to public attitudes.

The public thinks that 41% of the benefits bill goes to the unemployed. In fact, it is only 3% of the benefits bill. The public thinks that 27% of benefits are claimed fraudulently. In fact, only 0.7% is so claimed. The truth is that 80% of the people who claim jobseekers allowance—those so-called “Benefits Street” layabouts—only claim it for less than a year.

There is no credit to MPs if they constantly talk in a derogatory way about people who claim benefits when, at any given point in our lives, we may be dependent on social security—be it child benefit, benefits for the elderly or in-work benefits.

This benefits cap is arbitrary and bears no relationship to need, as our benefits system should. It does not allow for changing circumstances—rents going up and population rising—and will make inequality harder to tackle.

There are ways to cut welfare. We could put people back to work, introduce a national living wage, build affordable homes and have our compulsory jobs guarantee. An arbitrary cap is the wrong way in which to go and sends out the wrong message.

The Chancellor does not say many things that I think are correct, but he is correct to say that voting for this cap locks us into the coalition’s cuts. I say to the House that the issue of social security should not be about political positioning.

As the months turn into years, people will be coming to our advice surgeries wanting explanations for totally arbitrary and counter-productive cuts. Will we say that it was a game we were playing with the Chancellor one afternoon in March?

Our welfare system should be based on the facts and on need. Whatever short-term political advantage people think is gained by voting for this cap, it is far outweighed by what is problematic, so, no, I will not be voting for this cap in the Lobby tonight.

3 Comments

  1. Pauline Sharp says:

    Excellent speech by Diane. The labour party ought to be ashamed of themselves for backing this welfare cap. Thank god we still have a few mps with balls that do not lick the Tory party backsides.

  2. Mr jeffrey l davies says:

    The Commons agreed by 520 votes to 22 to back the £119.5 billion ceiling on welfare spending in 2015-16 announced by George Osborne in his Budget last week. The Labour frontbench, anxious to sidestep the Chancellor’s “trap”, supported the move but 13 Labour backbenchers defied Ed Miliband by opposing it.
    yet ed asks we are changing were to whot he didn’t show that he was a true labour supporter just another little tory in a blue tie or brown tie yet this shows how they think of us it seems 22 have voted against their minds telling them its wrong onward Christian soldier it seems labour isn’t that party of working men anymore but just we all in it you aint a shamefull day for all labour people when your mps voted for it another tory win it seems ed that you say one thing and do another yet want our money and our votes youl find that the unions will put forward real people who speak for us leaving labour or party of little torys to sink shamefull day again in parliament itsems austerity is just for the poor not those who can afford it

  3. David Pavett says:

    Good speech.

© 2021 Left Futures | Powered by WordPress | theme originated from PrimePress by Ravi Varma